Re: [PATCH] 2.4.18 scheduler bugs

From: Joe Korty (jak@rudolph.ccur.com)
Date: Fri Mar 15 2002 - 16:25:35 EST


>> - reschedule_idle() - smp_send_reschedule when setting idle's need_resched
>>
>> Idle tasks nowdays don't spin waiting for need->resched to change,
>> they sleep on a halt insn instead. Therefore any setting of
>> need->resched on an idle task running on a remote CPU should be
>> accompanied by a cross-processor interrupt.
>
> this is broken as well. Check out the idle=poll feature i wrote some time
> ago.

The idle=poll stuff is a hack. I'd like my idle cpus to sleep and still
have them wake up the moment work for them becomes available. I see no
reason why an idle cpu should be forced to remain idle until the next
tick, nor why fixing that should be considered `broken'.

Joe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 15 2002 - 22:00:21 EST