Re: [PATCH] 2.4.18 scheduler bugs

From: Ingo Molnar (mingo@elte.hu)
Date: Fri Mar 15 2002 - 15:57:06 EST


On Fri, 15 Mar 2002, Joe Korty wrote:

> > > [...] But on the Athlon the IPI isnt going down a little side channel
> > > between cpus.
> >
> > but even in the Athlon case an IPI is still an IRQ entry, which will add
> > at least 200 cycles or more to the idle wakeup latency.
>
> It is an idle cpu that is spending those 200 cycles.

wrong. When it's woken up it's *not* an idle CPU anymore, and it's the
freshly woken up task that is going to execute 200 cycles later...

        Ingo

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 15 2002 - 22:00:22 EST