Picking nits, but....
Andreas Ferber wrote:
> Setting the affinity of a whole process group also makes sense IMHO.
> Therefore I think an interface more like the setpriority syscall
> for sched_set_affinity (with two parameters which/who instead of a
> single PID) would be more flexible, eg.
>
> int sched_set_affinity(int which, int who, unsigned int len,
> unsigned long *new_mask_ptr);
>
> with who one of {PRIO_PROCESS,PRIO_PGRP,PRIO_USER} and which according
> to the value of who.
I soule suggest that the order be
int sched_set_affinity(int who, int which, unsigned int len,
unsigned long *new_mask_ptr);
This would have the {p,pg}id be the first thing that a programmer
would see (likely more important than the 'which'.).
-- Stephen Samuel +1(604)876-0426 samuel@bcgreen.com http://www.bcgreen.com/~samuel/ Powerful committed communication, reaching through fear, uncertainty and doubt to touch the jewel within each person and bring it to life.- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 15 2002 - 22:00:22 EST