Re: [PATCH] devexit fixes in i82092.c

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Sat Mar 16 2002 - 12:35:54 EST


> If it makes it easier for some, I consider poweroff not as an act unto
> itself, but as a transition to state D3cold. :) And since we will

That isnt neccessarily a good idea. Not every BIOS is terribly keen when
faced with a soft boot and someone having powered off all the PCI bridges.

> >This is what I want. Those reboot/shutdown notifiers are completely and
> >utterly buggy, and cannot sanely handle any kind of device hierarchy.
> >
> yep

They were never designed to. They should go - the new PM code can handle
everything they do, including refusals and more. It will also fix the ordering
problems some people hit with them.

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 23 2002 - 22:00:12 EST