Re: [Lse-tech] Re: 10.31 second kernel compile

From: Linus Torvalds (torvalds@transmeta.com)
Date: Sat Mar 16 2002 - 21:08:28 EST


On Sun, 17 Mar 2002, Paul Mackerras wrote:
>
> In particular I think it would help if set_pte could be given the
> mm_struct and the virtual address, then set_pte could fairly easily
> invalidate the hash-table entry (if any) corresponding to the PTE
> being changed. Would you consider a patch along these lines?

How about just doing a few more "update_mmu_cache()" type of things?

This is actually why update_mmu_cache() exists in the first place - to be
able to proactively fill in shadow information like hashed page tables.

Adding a "clear_mmu_cache()"?

                Linus

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 23 2002 - 22:00:13 EST