NO, just that one line 790
Cheers,
Andre Hedrick
LAD Storage Consulting Group
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, CaT wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 09:23:36PM -0800, Andre Hedrick wrote:
> > It is a BUG() check to see if there are cases where the interrupt handler
> > is being set (re armed) while it is currently set for another event.
> >
> > if (HWGROUP(drive)->handler != NULL)
> > BUG();
> > ide_set_handler(drive, handler, timeout, expirey);
> >
> > If we are reloading the handler but it was set but something else , never
> > called during a completion, and/or is dangling. It is a typo my bad :-(
> >
> > Edit and change it from "==" to "!="
>
> Now I'm confused. Should that be != to ==? :) And every instance I find?
>
> --
> SOCCER PLAYER IN GENITAL-BITING SCANDAL --- "It was something between
> friends that I thought would have no importance until this morning when
> I got up and saw all the commotion in the news," Gallardo told a news
> conference. "It stunned me."
> Reyes told Marca that he had "felt a slight pinch."
> -- http://www.azcentral.com/offbeat/articles/1129soccer29-ON.html
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 23 2002 - 22:00:27 EST