Re: readv() return and errno

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Tue Mar 26 2002 - 18:40:47 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: readv() return and errno"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [2.4.18] Security: Process-Killer if machine get's out of memory"
In reply to: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl: "Re: readv() return and errno"
Next in thread: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl: "Re: readv() return and errno"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> The above ERRORS section says: In case this call returns EINVAL
> one of the possible reasons is that an invalid argument was given.
> There do exist Unix-like systems (not necessarily Linux) that
> consider a zero count invalid.

Got me as well - by that meaning you are correct - the man page is only
wrong for ssize_t type stuff.

Sorry

Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: readv() return and errno"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [2.4.18] Security: Process-Killer if machine get's out of memory"
In reply to: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl: "Re: readv() return and errno"
Next in thread: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl: "Re: readv() return and errno"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Mar 31 2002 - 22:00:12 EST