Re: Scheduler priorities

From: Wessel Dankers (wsl@fruit.eu.org)
Date: Wed Mar 27 2002 - 15:23:35 EST

Next message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [RFC] kmem_cache_zalloc"
Previous message: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [RFC] kmem_cache_zalloc"
In reply to: Robert Love: "Re: Scheduler priorities"
Next in thread: Robert Love: "Re: Scheduler priorities"
Reply: Robert Love: "Re: Scheduler priorities"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 2002-03-27 08:41:51-0500, Robert Love wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-03-27 at 08:06, Nuno Miguel Rodrigues wrote:
>
> > Indeed. In other words a priority that is not dynamically adjusted over
> > time. Like a real-time scheduling priority.
>
> Yes, Linux has two - SCHED_FIFO and SCHED_RR.

Any plans for a SCHED_IDLE?

-- Wessel Dankers <wsl@fruit.eu.org>

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [RFC] kmem_cache_zalloc"
Previous message: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [RFC] kmem_cache_zalloc"
In reply to: Robert Love: "Re: Scheduler priorities"
Next in thread: Robert Love: "Re: Scheduler priorities"
Reply: Robert Love: "Re: Scheduler priorities"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Mar 31 2002 - 22:00:13 EST