On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 08:47:17PM -0700, Jeremy Jackson wrote:
> Should this go off lkml?
Should be ok to continue - I just wanted to make sure lkcd-devel
is in the loop too, since many of us don't monitor lkml that
closely all the time.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Suparna Bhattacharya" <suparna@in.ibm.com>
> Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 12:20 AM
>
> > > I'm currently researching combining the two, to create a LinuxBIOS
> > > firmware debug console, which will allow complete crash dump to
> > > be taken after a hardware reset, with the smallest possible Heisenburg
> > > effect, aside from a hardware debugger.
> >
> > So how is the actual writeout accomplished ?(via LinuxBIOS ?)
>
> well it's just an idea just now. In order to do this from code in rom,
> I immagine it would just dump physical memory to a raw partition,
> using polling ide drivers in LinuxBIOS. This is probably a step
OK. There have been plans to do this via polling drivers in software,
but guess if you can handle it at the LinuxBIOS level the impact may
be still lower.
> backwards, compared to modern crash dumps, but it would
> allow zero alteration of memory.
>
> It may be possible to do with a standard flash size of 128KiB,
> though, which would allow virtually all motherboards to support it.
>
> Jeremy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 15 2002 - 22:00:18 EST