Re: VIA, 32bit PIO and 2.5.x kernel

• Next message: E. Abbink: "Re: Problem using mandatory locks (other apps can read/delete etc)"
• Previous message: Shing Chuang: "[PATCH 2.4.19-pre6] via-rhine.c to support new VIA's nic chip VT6 105, V6105M (correct)."
• In reply to: Petr Vandrovec: "VIA, 32bit PIO and 2.5.x kernel"
• Next in thread: Andre Hedrick: "Re: VIA, 32bit PIO and 2.5.x kernel"
• Reply: Andre Hedrick: "Re: VIA, 32bit PIO and 2.5.x kernel"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, Apr 12 2002, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
> I believe that there must be some reason for doing that... And
> do not ask me why it worked in 2.4.x, as it cleared io_32bit
> in task_out_intr too.

Because 2.4 doesn't use that path for fs requests. And be glad that it
doesn't otherwise _everybody_ would have much worse problems than you
are currently seeing.

-- 
Jens Axboe
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: E. Abbink: "Re: Problem using mandatory locks (other apps can read/delete etc)"
• Previous message: Shing Chuang: "[PATCH 2.4.19-pre6] via-rhine.c to support new VIA's nic chip VT6 105, V6105M (correct)."
• In reply to: Petr Vandrovec: "VIA, 32bit PIO and 2.5.x kernel"
• Next in thread: Andre Hedrick: "Re: VIA, 32bit PIO and 2.5.x kernel"
• Reply: Andre Hedrick: "Re: VIA, 32bit PIO and 2.5.x kernel"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 15 2002 - 22:00:20 EST