Re: Multiple zlib.c's in 2.4.18

From: Tom Rini (trini@kernel.crashing.org)
Date: Sat Apr 13 2002 - 16:27:57 EST

Next message: andrew may: "Re: nanosleep"
Previous message: Christer Weinigel: "Re: 2.4.18 AND Geode GX1/200Mhz problem"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: Multiple zlib.c's in 2.4.18"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 07:42:01PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Further checking reveals that ./arch/ppc/boot/lib/zlib.c is based on
> > zlib-0.95, while the other two are zlib-1.0.4.
> >
> > Which one should I use? Shouldn't they be merged? And what about the
> > double-free() bug?
>
> There is progress going on to merge them (see 2.4.19-ac) so hopefully RSN
> that question won't be worth asking.

All of them that can be anyhow. I'm hoping no one will touch
arch/ppc/boot/lib/zlib.c :)

-- 
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: andrew may: "Re: nanosleep"
Previous message: Christer Weinigel: "Re: 2.4.18 AND Geode GX1/200Mhz problem"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: Multiple zlib.c's in 2.4.18"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 15 2002 - 22:00:22 EST