Re: implementing soft-updates

From: Wichert Akkerman (wichert@cistron.nl)
Date: Tue Apr 16 2002 - 05:45:53 EST

Next message: Andrey Panin: "[PATCH] drivers/net/epic100.c: missing __devinit"
Previous message: Cabaniols, Sebastien: "RE: Why HZ on i386 is 100 ?"
Next in thread: Mike Fedyk: "Re: implementing soft-updates"
Reply: Mike Fedyk: "Re: implementing soft-updates"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

In article <20020408203515.B540@toy.ucw.cz>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> wrote:
>How do you fix errors you find by such background fsck?

Theoretically I suppose you could use a writeable snapshot and then switch the
fscked snapshot with the currently mounted fs.

Wichert.

-- _________________________________________________________________ / Nothing is fool-proof to a sufficiently talented fool \ | wichert@wiggy.net http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ | | 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andrey Panin: "[PATCH] drivers/net/epic100.c: missing __devinit"
Previous message: Cabaniols, Sebastien: "RE: Why HZ on i386 is 100 ?"
Next in thread: Mike Fedyk: "Re: implementing soft-updates"
Reply: Mike Fedyk: "Re: implementing soft-updates"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 23 2002 - 22:00:14 EST