Re: Why HZ on i386 is 100 ?

From: David Mosberger (davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com)
Date: Tue Apr 16 2002 - 19:49:47 EST


>>>>> On Tue, 16 Apr 2002 10:18:18 -0700 (PDT), Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> said:

  Davide> i still have pieces of paper on my desk about tests done on
  Davide> my dual piii where by hacking HZ to 1000 the kernel build
  Davide> time went from an average of 2min:30sec to an average
  Davide> 2min:43sec. that is pretty close to 10%

The last time I measured timer tick overhead on ia64 it was well below
1% of overhead. I don't really like using kernel builds as a
benchmark, because there are far too many variables for the results to
have any long-term or cross-platform value. But since it's popular, I
did measure it quickly on a relatively slow (old) Itanium box: with
100Hz, the kernel compile was about 0.6% faster than with 1024Hz
(2.4.18 UP kernel).

        --david
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 23 2002 - 22:00:16 EST