Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree

From: Ian Molton (spyro@armlinux.org)
Date: Sat Apr 20 2002 - 22:46:16 EST


Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Awoke this dragon, who will now respond:

> The documentation being discussed is not proprietary, it only talks about
> a non essential proprietary tool used now by lots of kernel hackers.

well, this raises an interesting point...

should documentation be regarded as part of the package it documents or
not?

is this 'bitkeeper documentation', 'documentation about bitkeeper', or
'linux kernel documentation', or what?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 23 2002 - 22:00:28 EST