Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree

From: Jochen Friedrich (jochen@scram.de)
Date: Sun Apr 21 2002 - 04:28:36 EST


Hi,

> > We dont allow proprietary modules in the kernel, why should docs be any
> > different?
>
> The documentation being discussed is not proprietary, it only talks about a non
> essential proprietary tool used now by lots of kernel hackers.

So would Linus accept a document on how to run Linux/390 on hercules (yet
another proprietary emulator)? This also was a FAQ on the linux-390
mailing list until the documentation is available on the hercules home
page...

Developing kernel stuff on 390 without emulator can be much fun as host
operators tend to get very pissed if the IPL ratio comes near to 1/min ;-)

--jochen

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 23 2002 - 22:00:28 EST