Re: [patch] 64bit archs doing incorrect magic for smbfs?

• Next message: Anton Altaparmakov: "Re: eNBD on loopback [was Re: [PATCH] 2.5.8 IDE 36]"
• Previous message: Urban Widmark: "[patch] 64bit archs doing incorrect magic for smbfs?"
• In reply to: Urban Widmark: "[patch] 64bit archs doing incorrect magic for smbfs?"
• Next in thread: Petr Vandrovec: "Re: [patch] 64bit archs doing incorrect magic for smbfs?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

   From: Urban Widmark <urban@teststation.com>
   Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 12:37:04 +0200 (CEST)
   
   Untested patch vs 2.4.19-pre7-ac2 below adds version number checks for the
   smbfs case (yes, it handles the ascii format too). Similar changes are
   needed in 2.5.

I have no problems with this fix, you know the internals better
than me.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Anton Altaparmakov: "Re: eNBD on loopback [was Re: [PATCH] 2.5.8 IDE 36]"
• Previous message: Urban Widmark: "[patch] 64bit archs doing incorrect magic for smbfs?"
• In reply to: Urban Widmark: "[patch] 64bit archs doing incorrect magic for smbfs?"
• Next in thread: Petr Vandrovec: "Re: [patch] 64bit archs doing incorrect magic for smbfs?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 23 2002 - 22:00:28 EST