Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree

From: Jeff Garzik (garzik@havoc.gtf.org)
Date: Sun Apr 21 2002 - 10:35:36 EST


On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 03:57:59AM +0100, Ian Molton wrote:
> Russell King Awoke this dragon, who will now respond:
>
> > But no, in your eyes, I'm just another stupid BK person who's
> > contributing to the downfall of Linux, and is in the "in" club.
>
> I dont think Daniel claimed BK was contributing to linux downfall.

Sure he did.

> He said that having proprietary stuff in the kernel was a bad idea.
>
> We dont allow proprietary modules in the kernel, why should docs be any
> different?

The docs are not proprietary.

        Jeff

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 23 2002 - 22:00:28 EST