Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree

From: Larry McVoy (lm@bitmover.com)
Date: Sun Apr 21 2002 - 12:00:22 EST

Next message: Denis Vlasenko: "Re: /proc/stat weirdness"
Previous message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree"
In reply to: Jochen Friedrich: "Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree"
Next in thread: Anton Altaparmakov: "Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 06:46:07PM +0200, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
> > >Wrong. Many corporate firewalls allow email and http (both via proxy) and
> > >reject any other traffic. CVS and BK are both unusable in this
> > >environment.
> >
> > Not wrong. BK works fine over http protocol. CVS is another matter which I
> > cannot comment on...
>
> Ok, but there are other scenarios where only email is available (often via
> mail gateways like softswitch on os/390)...

BK works with email as its only transport and has for a long time.

bk help send
bk help receive

-- 
---
Larry McVoy            	 lm at bitmover.com           http://www.bitmover.com/lm 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Denis Vlasenko: "Re: /proc/stat weirdness"
Previous message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree"
In reply to: Jochen Friedrich: "Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree"
Next in thread: Anton Altaparmakov: "Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 23 2002 - 22:00:29 EST