Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre...

From: Daniel Phillips (phillips@bonn-fries.net)
Date: Sun Apr 21 2002 - 11:21:27 EST

Next message: Ben Greear: "Re: novice coding in /linux/net/ipv4/util.c From: DJ Barrow <dj.barrow@asitatech.com>"
Previous message: Andreas Dilger: "Re: [PATCH] open files in kjounald"
In reply to: Larry McVoy: "Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre..."
Next in thread: Larry McVoy: "Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre..."
Reply: Larry McVoy: "Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Monday 22 April 2002 18:10, Larry McVoy wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 05:50:25PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > > The existence (or non-existence) of the docs has absolutely no marketing
> > > value to BK.
> >
> > So you have no problem with moving them to a website, leaving a url in
> > SubmittingPatches?
>
> It's not my call to make.

I know that. I was wondering if *you personally* would have any objection.

> Take it up with the people who own the tree.

That's all of us, last I heard. Administrating it is, of course, another story.

-- 
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Ben Greear: "Re: novice coding in /linux/net/ipv4/util.c From: DJ Barrow <dj.barrow@asitatech.com>"
Previous message: Andreas Dilger: "Re: [PATCH] open files in kjounald"
In reply to: Larry McVoy: "Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre..."
Next in thread: Larry McVoy: "Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre..."
Reply: Larry McVoy: "Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 23 2002 - 22:00:31 EST