Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre...

From: Larry McVoy (lm@bitmover.com)
Date: Mon Apr 22 2002 - 14:44:53 EST

Next message: Witek Krêcicki: "PPC compile issue"
Previous message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: CONFIG_RAMFS in 2.4.19-pre7-ac2 ???"
In reply to: Roman Zippel: "Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre..."
Next in thread: Chris Adams: "Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 09:40:43PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
> > + Also, BitKeeper is not free software. You may use it for free, subject
> > + to the licensing rules (bk help bkl will display them), but it is

- to the licensing rules (bk help bkl will display them), but it is
+ to the licensing rules (http://www.bitkeeper.com/manpages/bk-bkl-1.html)

-- 
---
Larry McVoy            	 lm at bitmover.com           http://www.bitmover.com/lm 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Witek Krêcicki: "PPC compile issue"
Previous message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: CONFIG_RAMFS in 2.4.19-pre7-ac2 ???"
In reply to: Roman Zippel: "Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre..."
Next in thread: Chris Adams: "Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 23 2002 - 22:00:32 EST