Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree

From: Jonathan A. George (JGeorge@greshamstorage.com)
Date: Mon Apr 22 2002 - 14:56:55 EST


Alexander Viro wrote:

>On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Jonathan A. George wrote:
>
>>Not quite. Linus uses BK as a tool to facilitate kernel development.
>> However, he has not made BK _part_ _of_ _the_ _kernel_. ;-) Obviously
>>anyone can use any tool ON the kernel, but integrating into the kernel
>>is something else.
>>
>>>Talk Linus out of using BitKeeper, and sure, I'll remove the doc.
>>>
>>No need. His tools are his choice. The kernel itself is ours not his;
>> thus the distinction.
>>
>>
>
>Bullshit. His copy is his. Mine is mine. Yours is yours. Each of
>us is perfectly within his rights when he adds whatever patches he
>likes.
>
Both statements are true. Imagine that.

--Jonathan--

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 23 2002 - 22:00:32 EST