Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre...

From: Daniel Phillips (phillips@bonn-fries.net)
Date: Sun Apr 21 2002 - 15:42:46 EST


On Monday 22 April 2002 22:18, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 08:05:25PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > On Monday 22 April 2002 19:52, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > > Should we remove all advertisements from the kernel? A Big Penguin
> > > would probably object to the removal of this printk advertisement
> > > for Swansea:
> > >
> > > Linux NET4.0 for Linux 2.4
> > > Based upon Swansea University Computer Society NET3.039
> > >
> > > If the answer is no, then you are targetting BitKeeper specifically...
> >
> > Excellent point. If the BitKeeper advertising in the kernel source were
> > held to that level, I would be satisfied.
>
> <chuckle> -- and if that occurred, _I_ would fight to remove it as a
> pointless advertisement.

You'd want to get rid of the url that points at your docs?

-- 
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 23 2002 - 22:00:32 EST