> Please folks. When can we put the "tick on demand" thing to bed? If in
> doubt, get the patch from the high-res-timers sourceforge site (see
> signature for the URL) and try it. Overhead becomes higher with system
> load passing the ticked system at relatively light loads. Just what we
> want, very low overhead idle systems!
>
> The problem is in accounting (or time slicing if you prefer) where we
> need to start a timer each time a task is context switched to, and stop
> it when the task is switched away. The overhead is purely in the set up
> and tear down. MOST of these never expire.
Did you work out where exactly the overhead was and if it was hardware
specific? On ppc for example updating the timer is just a write to a cpu
register.
Anton
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 23 2002 - 22:00:34 EST