Re: Suggestion re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree

From: Christoph Hellwig (hch@infradead.org)
Date: Tue Apr 23 2002 - 11:06:06 EST


On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 08:12:39AM -0700, Larry McVoy wrote:
> If you're willing to use BK just as a transport, it's a far more efficient
> transport. Ask people who have run rsync/ftp/bk all on the same system,
> the BK way gets the same information across in less bits.

If it gets the information across. So far I haven't found any feature
in BK to allow restarting a pull or clone once it is interrupted.
For that reason I use rsync to get a large BK repo to my home machines,
which often is temporarily disconnected from the ISP.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 23 2002 - 22:00:35 EST