On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 06:40:35PM -0700, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 06:05:15PM -0700, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 05:49:11PM -0700, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> > > 2.4.18_fix_port_state_handling.diff
> > >
> > > Is causing the problem on 2.4.17-19p6tulip-br0fpsh. I haven't tested the
> > > other patches though.
> > >
> > > I'm going to reverse this patch on 2.4.19-pre6 to see if it fixes it there
> > > too. Stay tuned.
> >
> > 2.4.18_enslave_bridge_dev_to_bridge_dev.diff
> >
> > Is fine I didn't reproduce the trouble in 2.4.17-19p6tulip-br0ebdtbd (it was
> > already compiling when I tested the port_state kernel...).
> >
> > 2.4.19-pre6-nobr0fpsh building now...
>
> Yep, reversing 2.4.18_fix_port_state_handling.diff fixed it.
>
Instead of reversing the patch, use this patch from Lennert Buytenhek instead:
Note: this problem should only show up on smp kernels(unvarified), it showed
up with a smp kernel on a UP system for me.
--- linux-2.4.18/net/bridge/br_input.c.orig Thu Apr 18 11:50:16 2002
+++ linux-2.4.18/net/bridge/br_input.c Thu Apr 18 11:50:26 2002
@@ -161,8 +161,10 @@
handle_special_frame:
if (!dest[5]) {
br_stp_handle_bpdu(skb);
+ read_unlock(&br->lock);
return;
}
+ read_unlock(&br->lock);
kfree_skb(skb);
}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 23 2002 - 22:00:36 EST