Re: [PATCH] SIGURG incorrectly delivered to process

From: David Mosberger (davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com)
Date: Thu Apr 25 2002 - 13:59:19 EST

Next message: John Tyner: "[PATCH] Add AM29F040B Support"
Previous message: Chris Friesen: "Re: Dissociating process from bin's filesystem"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

>>>>> On Thu, 18 Apr 2002 15:52:32 +1000, Christopher Yeoh <cyeoh@samba.org> said:

  Christopher> If a process is sent a SIGURG signal and it is blocking
  Christopher> SIGURG signals, when the process subsequently unblocks
  Christopher> SIGURG signals it will be terminated even if it is set
  Christopher> to the default action (SIG_DFL) which is specified by
  Christopher> SUSv3 to ignore that signal.

Looks like a correct fix to me. I made this change to the ia64 tree.

Thanks,

--david
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: John Tyner: "[PATCH] Add AM29F040B Support"
Previous message: Chris Friesen: "Re: Dissociating process from bin's filesystem"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 30 2002 - 22:00:11 EST