Re: Possible bug with UDP and SO_REUSEADDR. Was Re: [PATCH] zerocopy NFS updated

From: David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Date: Thu Apr 25 2002 - 21:43:01 EST


   From: Terje Eggestad <terje.eggestad@scali.com>
   Date: 25 Apr 2002 14:37:44 +0200

   However writing a test server that stand in blocking wait on a UDP
   socket, and start two instances of the server it's ALWAYS the server
   last started that get the udp message, even if it's not in blocking
   wait, and the first started server is.
   
   Smells like a bug to me, this behavior don't make much sence.
   
   Using stock 2.4.17.

Can you post your test server/client application so that I
don't have to write it myself and guess how you did things?

Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 30 2002 - 22:00:12 EST