> On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 06:22:13PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> > > Umm, NUMA without SMP looks rather strange to me..
> > It's still fully possible, though I'm not clear on whether NUMA-Q
> > supports it.
> It doesn't really make sense :)
> Still I think it makes sense to have CONFIG_NUMAQ or whatever to depend
> on CONFIG_SMP
The way it is currently defined in the patch is that CONFIG_IBMNUMAQ (which
turns on CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM) depends on CONFIG_MULTIQUAD being set and that
depends on CONFIG_SMP being set. So, I'm still planning on removing the
#ifdef SMP. :-)
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to firstname.lastname@example.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 07 2002 - 22:00:11 EST