On Wed, 1 May 2002 18:13, you wrote:
> Con Kolivas wrote:
> > On Tue, 30 Apr 2002 02:51, you wrote:
> > > After applying it, if you ever do a make mrproper oldconfig dep bzImage
> > > it fails to compile sched.c as follows
> > >
> > > If I don't do an mrproper it compiles ok. Haven't tested yet.
> > Hmm
> > I used a make mrproper && make clean followed by manual configuration
> > without any problems but thanks for your input. I'm not claiming to be a
> > patch or kernel guru. Just offering what worked for me.
> > > It's the O1 sched patch. Not your fault....
> > Thanks thats kinda reassuring :)
> > Con.
> I take that back. It's the low-latency patch. You must have said no to
> it in your .config.
> I do not think all these patches play well together with the O(1)
Here is the relevant section from my .config:
# Processor type and features
# CONFIG_LOLAT_SYSCTL is not set
As you can see, the low latency is enabled. I didn't see any point in
enabling sysctl so I havent tried that. Perhaps that is it? The other thing
is, I don't believe it works well with SMP which I am not using.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to firstname.lastname@example.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 07 2002 - 22:00:11 EST