Re: discontiguous memory platforms

From: Roman Zippel (
Date: Thu May 02 2002 - 12:56:30 EST

Daniel Phillips wrote:

> Maybe this is a good place to try out a hash table variant of
> config_nonlinear. It's got to be more efficient than searching all the
> nodes, don't you think?

Most of the time there are only a few nodes, I just don't know where and
how big they are, so I don't think a hash based approach will be a lot
faster. When I'm going to change this, I'd rather try the dynamic table

bye, Roman
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 07 2002 - 22:00:14 EST