On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 01:29:43AM -0700, Vikram wrote:
> > How would this be better than MOSIX, or other clustering solutions?
> > Any URLs you may have on this would be quite helpful.
> uh-huh, you miss the pt maybe? uml offers a great testing, debugging,
> developing platform. the whole idea is to replace the real thing (say like
> kernel devel) with UML and your qn is more like why cant we use the real
> thing itself....:)
If you want to test clustering (or "UML SMP over several seperate hosts"
-JDike) with UML, why not just create a UML kernel with the clustering
support (ie, MOSIX) in that UML kernel?
Really, I'm just asking what the benifit is to use UML for clustering as
oposed to MOSIX. I can think of one, testing NUMA without special
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to firstname.lastname@example.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 07 2002 - 22:00:23 EST