Tux in main kernel tree? (was khttpd rotten?)

From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk (roy@karlsbakk.net)
Date: Mon May 06 2002 - 09:17:28 EST

> Right. If khttpd had been pulled from 2.4.17, I would have
> had weeks of warning that khttpd is unstable; instead, I learned
> only when someone started doing his own stress testing, and I
> have little time to fix it. I say pull it from
> 2.4.19-pre9. Marcello, put it out of its misery asap, please...
> it'd time for khttpd to become a standalone patch again.
> - Dan

Hi all

Perhaps it's about time to talk about pulling Tux into the main kernel
tree, as khttpd once again has proved ususable.


Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk, Datavaktmester

Computers are like air conditioners. They stop working when you open Windows.

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 07 2002 - 22:00:27 EST