> Right. If khttpd had been pulled from 2.4.17, I would have
> had weeks of warning that khttpd is unstable; instead, I learned
> only when someone started doing his own stress testing, and I
> have little time to fix it. I say pull it from
> 2.4.19-pre9. Marcello, put it out of its misery asap, please...
> it'd time for khttpd to become a standalone patch again.
> - Dan
Perhaps it's about time to talk about pulling Tux into the main kernel
tree, as khttpd once again has proved ususable.
-- Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk, Datavaktmester
Computers are like air conditioners. They stop working when you open Windows.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to email@example.com More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 07 2002 - 22:00:27 EST