I just put together a SuperMicro P4DCE+ (Intel i860/ICH2/CS4299 AC'97 codec
[use the OSS i810_audio or ALSA's intel_8x0 or whatever it is]) with 1GB of
Samsung RDRAM and two 2.0GHz Xeon (Prestonias.) Currently 2.4.19-pre7 with
Ingo's interrupt patch, and timer balancing patch. Running on ext3, using
I also tried the acpismp=force option to get into hyperthreading
(successfully--it appears as though I have 4 CPUs), and the overall system
seems just as fast as with the HT disabled. Qualitatively: kernel compile
with HT disabled, using
'make -j2 bzImage; make -j2 modules; make modules_install; sync'
results in compile times around 3 minutes 45 seconds or so. With HT enabled,
and using -j4 instead of -j2, my compile time comes down to around 2:57 or
so--a significant improvement.
However, 'dnetc's throughput in RC5 keys/s is much lower with HT enabled:
it runs 4 clients, and each client chugs through about 720kKeys/s.
With HT disabled, the two dnetc clients run through 2.8MKeys/s each. (So
it's around half as fast with HT enabled!) When I'm finished downloading
RedHat 7.3, I'll reboot into Hyperthreading-enabled mode, and run
'dnetc --benchmark' to confirm this.
Haven't had a chance to benchmark more than that yet. But no gross issues
when running with HT enabled. (Tribes2, Q3A and RTCW feel equally fast
between the two configurations.)
> I am trying to make a dual P4-Xeon box (P4DCE, Intel 869) work optimally.
> After some search in list archives, I have found this points:
> - You need ACPI, and boot with acpismp=force, to have hyperthreading
> (see 4 cpus)
> - To balance interrupts, a patch from Ingo is needed
> - To balance timers, one other patch was needed, but this in included
> in 2.4.19-pre8 (do not know since which pre is there)
> I tried to boot with acpismp=force, but then performance was dog slow,
> I could count lines scrolling on a rxvt.
> I checked mtrr and look like working. Box has 1Gb of ram, so kernel
> is using CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G=y.
> Kernel is the standard highmem Mandrake kernel in 8.2
> (2.4.18-6mdkenterprise) that is mainly a plain 2.4.18 with some
> .19-pre1 fixes.
> Any correction ? Any known problem in 2.4.18 about this issue that
> has bee corrected in pres for 19 ?
> Any idea about the performance loss ?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to email@example.com
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 07 2002 - 22:00:28 EST