Re: pfn-Functionset out of order for sparc64 in current Bk tree?

From: David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Date: Tue May 07 2002 - 16:44:08 EST

Next message: J.A. Magallon: "Re: Has anyone integrated the e1000 driver into the 2.4.x kernel"
Previous message: Dave Jones: "Re: 2.5.14-dj1: misc.o: undefined reference to `__io_virt_debug'"
In reply to: Thunder from the hill: "Re: pfn-Functionset out of order for sparc64 in current Bk tree?"
Next in thread: Roman Zippel: "Re: pfn-Functionset out of order for sparc64 in current Bk tree?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

From: Thunder from the hill <thunder@ngforever.de>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 15:52:59 -0600 (MDT)

   On Tue, 7 May 2002, David S. Miller wrote:
> I have the correct fixes for sparc64 in my tree and I'll merge it
> all to Linus.

   That's good. Where do I find a patch, or is it already merged?

Not merged, still testing and tweaking. It will be merged
after I am done with that.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: J.A. Magallon: "Re: Has anyone integrated the e1000 driver into the 2.4.x kernel"
Previous message: Dave Jones: "Re: 2.5.14-dj1: misc.o: undefined reference to `__io_virt_debug'"
In reply to: Thunder from the hill: "Re: pfn-Functionset out of order for sparc64 in current Bk tree?"
Next in thread: Roman Zippel: "Re: pfn-Functionset out of order for sparc64 in current Bk tree?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 07 2002 - 22:00:31 EST