Re: O(1) scheduler gives big boost to tbench 192

• Next message: Thunder from the hill: "Re: [PATCH] Possible SCSI (sr) mini-cleanup"
• Previous message: justincarlson@cmu.edu: "Re: Memory Barrier Definitions"
• In reply to: Mike Kravetz: "Re: O(1) scheduler gives big boost to tbench 192"
• Next in thread: Mike Kravetz: "Re: O(1) scheduler gives big boost to tbench 192"
• Reply: Mike Kravetz: "Re: O(1) scheduler gives big boost to tbench 192"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> BEFORE
> ------
> Pipe latency: 6.5185 microseconds
> Pipe bandwidth: 86.35 MB/sec
>
> AFTER
> -----
> Pipe latency: 6.5723 microseconds
> Pipe bandwidth: 540.13 MB/sec
>
> Comments? If anyone would like to see/test the code (pretty simple
> really) let me know.

Are you doing prefetches on the pipe data in your system. Im curious if
this is an SMP cross processor pipe issue or simply cache behaviour ?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Thunder from the hill: "Re: [PATCH] Possible SCSI (sr) mini-cleanup"
• Previous message: justincarlson@cmu.edu: "Re: Memory Barrier Definitions"
• In reply to: Mike Kravetz: "Re: O(1) scheduler gives big boost to tbench 192"
• Next in thread: Mike Kravetz: "Re: O(1) scheduler gives big boost to tbench 192"
• Reply: Mike Kravetz: "Re: O(1) scheduler gives big boost to tbench 192"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 07 2002 - 22:00:31 EST