Re: pfn-Functionset out of order for sparc64 in current Bk tree?

From: Roman Zippel (
Date: Tue May 07 2002 - 18:11:32 EST


On Tue, 7 May 2002, David S. Miller wrote:

> All of this is ignoring the fact that phys_base has to be subtracted
> from any physical address before applying as an index to mem_map on
> sparc64.

Not only on sparc64. :)
I was a bit in a hurry and forgot to mention that "detail"..., sorry. :)

bye, Roman

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 07 2002 - 22:00:31 EST