On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 10:07:44AM -0600, Richard Gooch wrote:
> Russell King writes:
> > Really? What about the case of the missing BKL for device opens that
> > you haven't really commented on?
>
> I did comment to you, privately, saying I was waiting to see what the
> consensus was on the issue of whether to move the BKL or not. I'll be
> sending a patch later this week to fix it.
Yes, and hey, we still have the problem a week layer, even after the
discussion went dead.
> > Seems like devfs _still_ has locking problems.
>
> A pretty minor one, given the comment I was responding to: "devfs is
> unfixable". I've noticed that even Al has gone quiet on the "devfs
> races" issue, now that the new code is in place :-)
Never the less, your comment about "no locking problems" is inaccurate.
devfs is calling at least one part of the kernel without obeying the
existing locking rules. That's definitely a devfs bug.
--
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux
http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 14 2002 - 12:00:09 EST