From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 11:23:00 +0100
On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 07:39:42PM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Right. If khttpd had been pulled from 2.4.17, I would have
> had weeks of warning that khttpd is unstable; instead, I learned
> only when someone started doing his own stress testing, and I
> have little time to fix it. I say pull it from
> 2.4.19-pre9. Marcello, put it out of its misery asap, please...
> it'd time for khttpd to become a standalone patch again.
Okay, what about the following:
Are you willing to start being the khttp maintainer?
I have not seen updates or any attempts at maintaining the
thing in about 2 years. Basically, since it went into the
tree.
If we aren't changing that situation, we are not removing
the impetus for taking khttpd out of the tree entirely.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 14 2002 - 12:00:10 EST