Re: [RFC][PATCH] IO wait accounting

From: Zlatko Calusic (zlatko.calusic@iskon.hr)
Date: Sun May 12 2002 - 14:05:03 EST

Next message: Mark Mielke: "Re: [RFC] ext2 and ext3 block reservations can be bypassed"
Previous message: Jakob Østergaard: "Re: [RFC] ext2 and ext3 block reservations can be bypassed"
In reply to: Rik van Riel: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] IO wait accounting"
Next in thread: Rik van Riel: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] IO wait accounting"
Reply: Rik van Riel: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] IO wait accounting"
Reply: Bill Davidsen: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] IO wait accounting"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br> writes:
>
> And should we measure read() waits as well as page faults or
> just page faults ?
>

Definitely both. Somewhere on the web was a nice document explaining
how Solaris measures iowait%, I read it few years ago and it was a
great stuff (quite nice explanation).

I'll try to find it, as it could be helpful.

-- 
Zlatko
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Mark Mielke: "Re: [RFC] ext2 and ext3 block reservations can be bypassed"
Previous message: Jakob Østergaard: "Re: [RFC] ext2 and ext3 block reservations can be bypassed"
In reply to: Rik van Riel: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] IO wait accounting"
Next in thread: Rik van Riel: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] IO wait accounting"
Reply: Rik van Riel: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] IO wait accounting"
Reply: Bill Davidsen: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] IO wait accounting"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 14 2002 - 12:00:18 EST