[BUG] 2.4 VM sucks. Again

• Next message: Peter T. Breuer: "Re: Kernel deadlock using nbd over acenic driver"
• Previous message: rwhron@earthlink.net: "Re: tiobench"
• Next in thread: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: [BUG] 2.4 VM sucks. Again"
• Reply: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: [BUG] 2.4 VM sucks. Again"
• Reply: Johannes Erdfelt: "Re: [BUG] 2.4 VM sucks. Again"
• Reply: jlnance@intrex.net: "Re: [BUG] 2.4 VM sucks. Again"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

hi all

I've been here complaining about the 2.4 VM before, and here I am, back again.

PROBLEM:
----------------------
Starting up 30 downloads from a custom HTTP server (or Tux - or Apache -
doesn't matter), file size is 3-6GB, download speed = ~4.5Mbps. After some
time the kernel (a) goes bOOM (out of memory) if not having any swap, or (b)
goes gong swapping out anything it can.

The custom HTTP server processes each have a static buffer of two megabytes,
no malloc()s, and are written in < 1000 lines of C.

Theory: The buffer fills up, as the clients can't read as fast as kernel is
reading from disk, and the server goes boom

thanks for any help

roy

-- 
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk, Datavaktmester
Computers are like air conditioners.
They stop working when you open Windows.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Peter T. Breuer: "Re: Kernel deadlock using nbd over acenic driver"
• Previous message: rwhron@earthlink.net: "Re: tiobench"
• Next in thread: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: [BUG] 2.4 VM sucks. Again"
• Reply: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: [BUG] 2.4 VM sucks. Again"
• Reply: Johannes Erdfelt: "Re: [BUG] 2.4 VM sucks. Again"
• Reply: jlnance@intrex.net: "Re: [BUG] 2.4 VM sucks. Again"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 23 2002 - 22:00:28 EST