Re: [2.5 patch] ide-tape.c must include buffer_head.h

From: Jens Axboe (axboe@suse.de)
Date: Wed May 29 2002 - 05:51:07 EST

Next message: David Woodhouse: "Re: wait queue process state"
Previous message: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo: "Re: [PATCH][RFC] PentiumPro/II split in x86 config"
In reply to: Adrian Bunk: "[2.5 patch] ide-tape.c must include buffer_head.h"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, May 26 2002, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Hi Christoph,
>
> after your removal of #include <linux/buffer_head.h> from fs.h ide-tape.c
> no longer compiles:

The usage of BH_Lock is completely wrong in ide-tape! BH_Lock is a
buffer_head flag, but it's setting/clearing the bio flags. Whoever did
that 2.5 conversion messed that part up.

-- Jens Axboe

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: David Woodhouse: "Re: wait queue process state"
Previous message: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo: "Re: [PATCH][RFC] PentiumPro/II split in x86 config"
In reply to: Adrian Bunk: "[2.5 patch] ide-tape.c must include buffer_head.h"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 31 2002 - 22:00:24 EST