Hi,
No matter if ya'll reply, but a few things to be mentioned:
On Sun, 2 Jun 2002, Ion Badulescu wrote:
> However, having both in the tree can mean only one of a few things:
5. the better will stay, the worse will be pulled from the tree.
> Also, don't say 'well you need the core to do this and that', it only shows
> that you don't understand the core and you're treating it like a black box.
> Once you do understand it, you'll see there are many ways to break it up
> feature-wise.
But other features require parts of the thing you call core which won't
get in because they look silly without the stuff that is using it. Who
needs a loose mdbm?
Regards,
Thunder
-- ship is leaving right on time | Thunder from the hill at ngforever empty harbour, wave goodbye | evacuation of the isle | free inhabitant not directly caveman's paintings drowning | belonging anywhere- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 07 2002 - 22:00:12 EST