On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 07:40:27PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 02:25, David Gibson wrote:
> > The signal/noise bit is probably a red herring. We have problems with
> > the reporting of this, but it's mostly cosmetic. I seem to have
> > confusing and contradictory information about how to interpret the
> > values the firmware reports.
>
> Ok the old driver gets the noise level right, the newer one got it
> wrong, the current one gets it wrong. The good news is the old one
> works, the new one didnt, the current 2.4.19pre one does...
Um, ok, now I'm a bit lost. I'm guessing by "old driver" you mean the
pre 2.4.18 one (0.06f?) by "new driver" you mean the one in 2.4.18 and
"current driver" means the one in 2.4.19pre (0.11b) - i.e. newer than
the "new" one. Is that right?
-- David Gibson | For every complex problem there is a david@gibson.dropbear.id.au | solution which is simple, neat and | wrong. -- H.L. Mencken http://www.ozlabs.org/people/dgibson - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 07 2002 - 22:00:13 EST