Re: [ANNOUNCE] Adeos nanokernel for Linux kernel

From: Erik Andersen (andersen@codepoet.org)
Date: Mon Jun 03 2002 - 03:46:06 EST

Next message: Vojtech Pavlik: "Re: INTEL 845G Chipset IDE Quandry"
Previous message: Vojtech Pavlik: "Re: INTEL 845G Chipset IDE Quandry"
In reply to: Karim Yaghmour: "[ANNOUNCE] Adeos nanokernel for Linux kernel"
Next in thread: Alessandro Rubini: "Re: [ANNOUNCE] Adeos nanokernel for Linux kernel"
Reply: Alessandro Rubini: "Re: [ANNOUNCE] Adeos nanokernel for Linux kernel"
Reply: Karim Yaghmour: "Re: [ANNOUNCE] Adeos nanokernel for Linux kernel"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon Jun 03, 2002 at 04:35:04AM -0400, Karim Yaghmour wrote:
> Here are some of the possible uses for Adeos (this list is far
> from complete):

Looks kindof cool in theory. Have you done any benchmarking on
the performance hit on Linux kernel vs baseline? What is the
software patent outlook for this approach look like?

-Erik

--
Erik B. Andersen             http://codepoet-consulting.com/
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Vojtech Pavlik: "Re: INTEL 845G Chipset IDE Quandry"
Previous message: Vojtech Pavlik: "Re: INTEL 845G Chipset IDE Quandry"
In reply to: Karim Yaghmour: "[ANNOUNCE] Adeos nanokernel for Linux kernel"
Next in thread: Alessandro Rubini: "Re: [ANNOUNCE] Adeos nanokernel for Linux kernel"
Reply: Alessandro Rubini: "Re: [ANNOUNCE] Adeos nanokernel for Linux kernel"
Reply: Karim Yaghmour: "Re: [ANNOUNCE] Adeos nanokernel for Linux kernel"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 07 2002 - 22:00:14 EST