Hi,
On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Martin.Knoblauch wrote:
> now my/the questions are:
>
> - is what Kai is doing really leading to kbuild2.5
Not necessarily (Yet, it doesn't. It's just a plug of what was _indeed_
corrected directly the like in kbuild-2.5.) But yet I'm confident we'll
get that done, but we all (even Kai) will have to change our attitudes.
However, I don't have prejudices for Kai, and I will try my best to get my
work done.
> - how man iterations will it take, will it be ready for 2.6 (whenenvwer
> that is).
If it goes on the like it did for now, you'd better wait for linux-2.8. I
don't think it will get in like this.
> - at what point will the kbuild-users have to learn new tricks, where is
> the point of no-return?
The moment we merge Makefile-2.5 and Makefile, discarding compatibility
targets.
However, try my linux-2.5.20-ct1, scheduled for somewhen until Wednesday.
You can get a clear insight on some things such as kbuild-2.5 then.
> Martin
Regards,
Thunder
-- ship is leaving right on time | Thunder from the hill at ngforever empty harbour, wave goodbye | evacuation of the isle | free inhabitant not directly caveman's paintings drowning | belonging anywhere- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 07 2002 - 22:00:16 EST