Re: [PATCH][2.5] Double quote patches part two: drivers 2/2

From: Thunder from the hill (thunder@ngforever.de)
Date: Thu Jun 13 2002 - 14:54:37 EST

Next message: Shipman, Jeffrey E: "RE: TCP checksum?"
Previous message: Horst von Brand: "Re: RFC: per-socket statistics on received/dropped packets"
In reply to: Pavel Machek: "Re: [PATCH][2.5] Double quote patches part two: drivers 2/2"
Next in thread: Rusty Russell: "Re: [PATCH][2.5] Double quote patches part two: drivers 2/2"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi,

On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Why are not these fed through trivial? Having two different people for
> easy patches seems pretty confusing...

I don't know how much trivial will be confused if it gets two different
patches each fixing two different things. Also, my script sends to LKML by
default.

Regards,
Thunder

-- German attitude becoming | Thunder from the hill at ngforever rightaway popular: | "Get outa my way, | free inhabitant not directly for I got a mobile phone!" | belonging anywhere

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Shipman, Jeffrey E: "RE: TCP checksum?"
Previous message: Horst von Brand: "Re: RFC: per-socket statistics on received/dropped packets"
In reply to: Pavel Machek: "Re: [PATCH][2.5] Double quote patches part two: drivers 2/2"
Next in thread: Rusty Russell: "Re: [PATCH][2.5] Double quote patches part two: drivers 2/2"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 15 2002 - 22:00:29 EST