On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 07:41:06AM -0400, rwhron@earthlink.net wrote:
> > When the IDE carnage first started back circa 2.5.3, I had contemplated
> > not merging *any* of the IDE patches, just so that people who want to
> > work on other areas could have something solid to build upon.
> > I regret not following through on that instinct.
>
> I give the -dj series a vote of "good taste". In my testing they have
> been reliable. Recently, 2.5.20-dj[34] completed all my tests, whereas
> 2.5.{19,20,21} haven't. I realize breakage in the development series
> is expected and sometimes good. Nonetheless, "two thumbs up" for -dj.
That's interesting. What exactly was failing ? It'd be in everyones
interests to get those bits pushed to Linus sooner.
Dave.
-- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 15 2002 - 22:00:33 EST