Re: 2.4.19-pre10 link error - cpqarray related ?

From: Dave Jones (davej@suse.de)
Date: Tue Jun 18 2002 - 09:20:43 EST

Next message: X.Xiao: "static inline vs. extern inline; inline vs. __inline__"
Previous message: Petter: "Re: small 5575 PCI ATM fix"
In reply to: White, Charles: "RE: 2.4.19-pre10 link error - cpqarray related ?"
Next in thread: White, Charles: "RE: 2.4.19-pre10 link error - cpqarray related ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 09:11:23AM -0500, White, Charles wrote:
> Interesting... It compiled for me fine. Both statically and dynamic.
>
> What version of the compiler are you using?

__devexit/__devexit_p problems are a binutils issue.
Likely you have an older binutils which doesn't exhibit this problem.

Dave

-- 
| Dave Jones.        http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
| SuSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: X.Xiao: "static inline vs. extern inline; inline vs. __inline__"
Previous message: Petter: "Re: small 5575 PCI ATM fix"
In reply to: White, Charles: "RE: 2.4.19-pre10 link error - cpqarray related ?"
Next in thread: White, Charles: "RE: 2.4.19-pre10 link error - cpqarray related ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jun 23 2002 - 22:00:16 EST