Re: Linux 2.5.23 cpu_online_map undeclared

From: Rusty Russell (rusty@rustcorp.com.au)
Date: Thu Jun 20 2002 - 17:59:35 EST


On Wed, 19 Jun 2002 05:36:08 +0000 (UTC)
torvalds@transmeta.com (Linus Torvalds) wrote:

> Actually, it _should_ be declared, it's just that on UP it should be
> defined to the constant 1.
>
> Somehow that #define got dropped by the hotplug-CPU stuff.

Actually, was deliberate. Not exposing the mask when almost everyone
just wants to know "are any of these cpus online" was a preemptive strike
against NR_CPUS > BITS_PER_LONG (I wouldn't have bothered but I was so
close anyway).

My mistake was not noticing that x86 SMP was still exposing it and that
scheduler changes since my original patch were using it. Fixed with
cpu_online_mask(res, mask) in prior patch.

Apologies, and hope that clarifies,
Rusty.

-- 
   there are those who do and those who hang on and you don't see too
   many doers quoting their contemporaries.  -- Larry McVoy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jun 23 2002 - 22:00:23 EST