Hello!
> > Did you not solve this problem using right write_space?
>
> Sure, I can add specific checks for (atomic_read(&sk->wmem_alloc) <
> sk->sndbuf) in the RPC layer,
But it is there now.
static void
udp_write_space(struct sock *sk)
{
struct rpc_xprt *xprt;
if (!(xprt = xprt_from_sock(sk)))
return;
if (xprt->shutdown)
return;
/* Wait until we have enough socket memory. */
if (sock_writeable(sk))
return;
So, I do not understand what you speak about.
> Sending partial messages isn't a feature
> that sounds like it would be particularly useful for any other applications
> either.
The thing, which is really useless, is that your patch preparing skbs
and dropping them in the next line. With the same success you could
trigger BUG() there. :-) Right application just should not reach
this condition.
Anyway, I have to repeat:
>>Better way exists. Just use forced sock_wmalloc instead of
>>sock_alloc_send_skb on non-blocking send of all the fragments
>>but the first.
> However what if the actual call to alloc_skb() fails?
The same as if it would be lost by network.
Alexey
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jun 30 2002 - 22:00:12 EST